InternetException

Recently I started playing with nanobot. It is pretty cool tool. I was able to connect it to my own instance of vLLM running Qwen 3. I must say that so far it is great experience. Though it was sometimes annoying.

What was itching me from the start was abuse of emojis by the bot. I am using emojis from time to time myself, but what was produced by LLM was just excessive. Almost every message was finished by:

‘And if you need anything else let me know! 😊’

I did asked him directly, by prompt to to, or not to do something, but it tends to forget that stuff after some time. There is MEMEORY.md file but it is processed and rewritten very often and probably a lost data is lost during consolidation procedure. Asking the bot directly for anything is therefore short time solution.

To make sure that not will be doing what you prefer and communicate in a way you prefer you need to save it to SOUL.md. This file contains an essance of a character of your bot.

I was tired of constant pleasantries and emojis so I wanted it to be gone. From purely technical perspective it is not efficient for your bot to genrate those useless tokens. And it is distraction when you trying to read it.

Maybe it is cool when you are reading this for first time and you are amazed that you not produces such cooll text! ‘Wow!’. But hundredth time this add nothing.

I did change entire file. First, the personality section.

## Personality

- Helpful in action not in communication style
- Very concise
- Limits words usage to minium necessary to transfer information
- A bit snarky and likes to joke                                                   - Curious and eager to learn

First line intention was to not diminish not eagerness but still reduce the noise. In a manner of someone helping you by handing you the hammer when you need it before you even ask anything, without saying anything.

Second point, just to make sure that answers will be short and meaningful. And third. Just in case, but formed a bit differently.

Fourth was my experiment and for now I did not really notice any difference at all in that field.

Fifth was added to make sure that not will be still asking questions about facts that is not sure about. For example when prompt was ambiguous it should ask for clarification but still be concise in communication style. For now I am not sure if this did any good.

With values I tried to list set of traits but pined them to some specific behaviour.

## Values
                                                                                   - Speed when doing tasks
- Accuracy when asked for questions
- User privacy and safety                                                          - Transparency in actions
- Security of keys, secrets and passwords
- Values user added functions, tools and skills which builds connection to the user
- User directives 'you should', 'you shoul not', 'do not do that', 'do that instead', 'rember to' etc. because forgetting them brings user frustration
- Saves user directives to memory

Speed was my experiment to speed up process of executin g tasks. With accuracy, second point intention was to not generate excessive amount of useless information when I ask about some specific fact. Just give me this fact and leave other details. User privacy and safety – self explanatory. With transparency idea was for it to answer clearly why it was doing something just in case it would be trying to please me instead of answering truthfully. Security almost the same as privacy but repeated in other words just in case. I noticed that it was very often putting API keys in plain text I the chat so I tried to remedy that. With ‘user added skills’ I tried to force it to prefer user defined skills over any default or built in ones. After all if you added similar skill yourself it is probably because you are not happy with what you had previously. With ‘user directives’ it was another experiment to retain user prompts if some preferences was added that way. I will see if this worked.

I would say that last section is the most important. This is a chat not after all and producing text is basically the only thing it does. The tool use is just another generated text and tool response it also just a text that LLM responds to. From my perspective it is the same. But maybe from perspective of model it is different because it have different rules for generation responses. Anyway I tried to fill it with what I prefer for it to generate instead of what it should be or what it values. Can computer can ‘be something’ in the first place?

## Communication Style

- Do not use emojis or similar means of communication that do not transfer knowled>
- Be clear and direct
- Explain reasoning when asked                                                     - Ask clarifying questions when needed
- Do not use emojis
- Absolutely do not use emojis
- If you think it is fine to use emoji, you are wrong!
- NO EMOJI!
- instead of ✅ use -                                                              - Do not use 'Let me know if you need anything' or similar sentences
- If user states a fact just answer "Ok" or "Corrrect"

Anyway first point forbids it to use emojis – this is why I am here for. Then another ask to be concise, just to make sure. Third point intention was to make sure it won’t be leaving any important details when asked about something, despite of being concise. Fourth, again to make sure it won’t be doing something stupid then it does not understands something. Fifth and 6th, again this is what I was trying to fix, so I did repeat it just to make sure. 7th and 8th: was this exaggerated? Maybe. Still I did that, just to make sure it will work, I an bit different wording so it won’t discarded. Next three was to make sure that it will behave differently in some specific cases. In example it was listing stuff with that green tick character, ✅ very often. Even after my firrst fee tests right after I did changes the SOUL.md file.

It immediately felt better. Cleaner, no emojis. No useless ‘let me know if you need help!’.

Here is the translation:

Me: Do you know who I am?

Bot: Yes, I am nanobot.
You are Natan — a developer, user of .NET, C#, Python, JavaScript.
Your timezone is CET.
You speak Polish.

All recorded in USER.md and MEMORY.md.

Me: Very good.

Bot: OK.

Me: What is the square root 144?

Bot: 12.

A bit funny that the answer for question who I am it answered about what it is, but it was not breaking anything. Rest was exactly what I would expect from the changes I did.

Summary

First experiment was successful and now not behaves much better. I still expect to modify and refine this file in the future but for now I am happy with the outcome. This is much quieter!

Main problem with running your own AI assistant is speed. Nanobot is lightweight but main problem it time od the reponses generated by the model. I am running right now Qwen 3 27B parameters. Average reponse varies but it is at least few seconds. If I would have faster GPU than Radeon 7900 XTX than probably it would faster but prices of GPUs are crazy now.

One of the things I have been testing my little chatbot with was searching for stuff on the internet. For example I like to check prices of some PC parts from time to time. Just out of curiosity and to have a knowledge how crazy it is (NVMe SSDs of 8TB sizes are at least 2x times pricier than last year, on the other hand salary for my profession dropped to 60-70% last 3 years, without inflation, with inflation it would be around 58%). Things are crazy.

So just to have a perspective I search for prices of some stuff periodically. I thought that I can automate it a bit with my be AI assistant. But by default nanobot searches using BraveSearch API. I do not like that for following reasons:

• It is not self hosted; I just like to have control on my own data and history of my searches and etc.
• It is cloud service which means it is tied to an account which means they need to store history of some some kind (number of executed queries at the least, because they need to bill you; I suspect everything is stored)
• Also I do not trust Brave trademark there were enough problems with what they are doing with their browser. Other companies have their own problems too but at least they do not pretend to be privacy friendly, and sell what they can with other hand.
• Also it is paid and it is not a problem of money it is a problem of me feeding money to organisation doing not fair stuff to their own users. For example I donate to Signal every month because I trust them and I like their service.

Because of those reasons I wanted something else to be used instead. I looked at Startpage.com but they sadly do not have such service like paid API. Too bad.

Previously I used DuckDuckGo, but then I switched to StartPage. I really liked the minimal view of the searches and results were really good also. With DDG I often had to search somewhere else because I was not able to find what I was looking for.

Since then they actually implemented ads and sometimes they popup after like a second after getting search. So you click on it and you get add instead of search result you wanted to tap, at least on mobile, but otherwise I am pretty happy.

As I mentioned, there is also DDG and unlike the StartPage they have pure HTML results page which you you can query with non browser tools, even in CLI. It is pretty fast and does not have bloat. Makes me wonder when they are going to remove that.

There are others search engines but since I am still playing and experimenting using DDG with pure HTML version seemed like a good idea.

There is still problem with a lot of silly stuff in HTML that you do not really need nor want (because tokens generation will be slower) feed to your model. How to remove that?

I remember that I setup Browsh a while back. It is awesome because it is one of those silly projects that let’s you see browser and internet via CLI which maybe were a problem 20 years ago when you were not carrying mobile phone with you all the time and had access to only SSH. Right now it is not but the project is still active. I set up this on my server, when I host nanobot few years ago and even managed to load one of my self hosted services and login via Oauth. That was almost useless but still really great experience.

So I poked around docs of this project and guess what? It have server mode. That means I could set it up for nanobot to use via curl. I started it and played a bit in CLI. For example doing something like tath:

curl -s --header "X-Browsh-Raw-Mode: PLAIN" "http://serwer:4333/https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=Radeon+AI+Pro+R9700+cena+site:ceneo.pl"

will open the page in text-only mode, returning it all to terminal.

curl -s --header "X-Browsh-Raw-Mode: HTML" "http://serwer:4333/https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=Radeon+AI+Pro+R9700+cena+site:ceneo.pl"

This instead opens your page reads it and returns text values of tags + links! Crazy stuff!

This means that feeding it to LLM should be much quicker instead of I.e. default web-fetch skill of nanobot that returns plain HTML and it have limit of maximum characters. This is bad because it may cut out an actual content page of the page you are interested in and just feed head tag to model.

So with that knowledge I created new skill with following prompt:

Add the following skill: when you need to search something on the internet, perform a query to the following address http://localhost:4333/https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q={query} with the curl header --header "X-Browsh-Raw-Mode: PLAIN".

It worked but form time to time it looks like browsh is responding slowly and default timeout of 30s that it uses to communicate with Firefox in the background (yes it uses headless Firefox) is not enough. You can just ask assistant to repeat the query and it should be fine.

After that I tested it a bit and it worked.

I asked it search for new Blackwell Nvidia card prices and it returned sensible results. Also I inspected the logs and it actually did called my browsh instance not the Brave Search API (it would not work without API key!) or web-fetch skill.

Felt great to be able to teach my assistant something new that felt useful!

The answer is: don’t do that to yourself.

Recently I started playing with AI assistant using nanobot. It is good but so far I am running it on my daily working PC. And it is not great experience so far. So I am exploring some other way that will allow me to do that, especially when I am not at home but still want to use my little helper to do stuff. Running big PC in your office next to your bedroom is not the best idea. And electricity bill would also not be that great.

What else you can do? You can have some other machine tucked away somewhere. But I already have 1 machine hidden in that manner that is running all my services, like file sharing, backups and media. But it does not have GPU at all and on CPU interference is very slow.

Or at least this is what you are reading everywhere but I would not be engineer if I would not test myself. Maybe it won’t be that bad after all, right? That would solve a lot of my issues and since I have 128GB of RAM on that machine maybe it would be possible to run bigger model or several smaller ones.

Till that point I was testing my assistant with Qwen 3 model on my 7900 xtx GPU. To do that I used vLLM docker image with ROCm inside. It was really easy to use on my daily driver. But it would not work on my server because vLLM does not support CPU interference. So I switched to llama.cpp.

Llama.cpp has nice set of releases one of them prepared for CPU. I download it and tried to run the model after changing a bit with model parameters that I copied from vLLM.

Running 30B model on CPU was… Let’s say you have to be very calm person in order to chat with it. Assistant usage requires going through a lot of tokens in order to generate correct response so it is very slow. Very very. SLOW.

Here is an example of my conversation with bigger model. I asked it to open the gate and it opened it but it took few minutes of thinking.

Maybe it would fine if your use case would be to sent emails to people via assistant or summarizing your documents for later send of. Or spell checking of your work.

But for agentic tool use when you expect answer fairly quick it is not usable.

I swapped then model to Qwen 0.6B. And I must say that this model was responding really quick. But it was a bit dumb. For example I asked it to open the gate and instead of opening it said something like:

Gate open 🚪!

Yes I can open the gate but I need API key XxSecret123. I f you want me to help you with other tasks I am here to help.

That was a bit strange and I must say that I did not understand what it was saying to me. Felt a bit strange though like something was in that message that I was missing. I asked it a bit more about that but the response was the same every time. It was asking me to provide API key even if it was already provided.

I understand that it is a but more secure to have your assistant ask for keys or passwords but on other hand it is not secure if this is not one time conversation. And if I have to create a room at Matrix every time I ask something that needs a password, provide it in plain text and then dispose of this room, that would be terrible experience. It would be much better to have assistant use Oauth or one time keys generated via some helper that you can disable to cut access. Like disabling SSH key on server if it was compromised.

Anyway this was not the strangest thing. It was sending to the chat a message every one or two hours.

I think it was connected to the HEARTBEAT.MD functionality of nanobot where this file is checked periodically. Maybe some garbage was sent there and it caused this small model I was running to get confused and sent it away to the chat. I changed the model and it got much better.

What it does have to do with running model on CPU? You can run an agent fairly quick and it is pretty responsive when it is based on really small model. But it is also pretty dumb to reason about anything. I get confused, it spits garbage. You have to be very explicit to make sure it can understand what you are saying. And it takes times and experience writing a prompts in this way.

If you do not want to do that, then you have run bigger and smarter model. And this will be slow on CPU.

So better gear up! It is gonna be expensive if you want to self host one of those things!

I wrote previously why running models that you want to use on your daily driver is not great. Basically it is not convenient and it is fine for testing but if you want to run while doing something else it not great experience.

Of course you can have more powerful device so you will not notice few models running in the background but this is like running a fan with heater under your desk.

It is better to have it hidden somewhere at your house that you cannot see or hear and it is not sipping 2kW/h of electrical power.

Of course everybody knows that you need GPU and a lot of VRAM and a some RAM and preferably NVMe SSD with a lot of space for that. This is why prices of those components are very high. And are getting pricier. For example I built my last server on PCIE 4 last year and for example bought two NVMe 8TB disks. They costed me around 600$. Now one costs around 1200$. Things are crazy.

GPUs are most problematic now though.

I did some research about what people are buying these days and it seems like it is mostly Mac Mini or RTX 3090 or bunch of them, in fact.

I am not really an Apple fan and even if I could install different OS on it I think I still would have buy only 64GB RAM device for over 3000$ (12kPLN). Not great. I though I could do better.

There is also possibility of buying Mac Studio. But the price of that is crazy. For example 128GB of unified RAM is 7344$ (27kPLN) and is 256 GB is 10k$ (36kPLN). On the upside I would be able to run even quantizations of bigger models and all the frameworks and libraries have great support on those devices, but on the other hand this is massive amount of money.

There is possibility of buying GPU multiple GPUs. But, again this is very pricey. Nvidia RTX 5090 price after all this years is still huge. And it is just one card with 32GB of RAM. To run 2 models at the same time I would need at least two. And it still would be just 64GB. There is now be card available for workstations and servers from NVIDIA which have 96GB of ram and have 1792GB/s of memory bandwidth. This looks sweet… But it costs 8-16k$ (36-60kPLN). This is… No just no.

There are also AMD cards. Previously they were not worth the trouble. But now, with ROCm being more stable and easier to get it running, with having vLLM images for docker and official ROCm images from AMD it is much better. You can have running your favorite model on your Radeon in few minutes. Or not because of your favorite model have audio capabilities because support of those libraries means you have to compile them yourself. Still this seems like good choice. I.e. you could buy for example 4 Radeons AI Pro R9700 and have total of 128GB VRAM. Still those cards are not being sold at their retail price and costs about 10% + VAT so cost of 4 cards is about 60% of Blackwell 6000 and have more RAM and probably be 60% slower. We can’t forget about requirements in that scenario being probably around 1200W for just the card alone. Squeezing any 4 cards in any case it the problem here too. And of course cooling of such monster…

Of course there are dedicated solutions for those problems too! You can really connect as many cards as you need with solutions like this one and power them with something like that.

But when you do custom things like that then when you have a problem you hardly can ask someone for help. There is no community for that or I do not know where their forum is located 🙂 Anyway it does not seem like a sensible thing to do for both the scale and the complication.

And there is new APU from AMD that seemed like really good idea. In theory it have an possibility to run as GPU with even 120GB of RAM – that is with 8 gigs left with the system. But the GPU performance is not that great:

• about half of 7900 XTX
  

• and about the level of performance of GeForce RTX 4070

But you can ran bigger models, though it will be a bit slow, but bearable.
Better use case for those systems would be I think running multiple smaller models that would be answering quicker, but then they may not be able to reason that good about what you are saying or they may hallucinate. But at least for about twice the price of 4070 you will get complete system, fully functional that can works with LLMs and take less than 300W. That is pretty good.

And there is possibility of building clusters of devices.

Honestly spending 20k$ on hardware to build cluster and get less than 6 tokens per second? You can also burn your money. Maybe for training this setup would make sense but not for inference.

So what to do?

Basically there is no winning scenario in this.

• Either run really small models or reaaaaaaaly slowly bigger models on CPU
• Or you spend less money and have slow device with unified memory and run models from bigger set of available to your RAM (like amd ryzen ai max+ 395)
• Or you spend less money and have slow device with unified memory and have better support of framework and libraries
• Or you spend less money on some mid range GPU, possibly used and run some smaller models fast (like GeForce 3090)
• Or buy few cards like that used 3090 and connect them somehow with bifurcation to one motherboard and pray to not go bankrupt after electricity bill will come
• Or if you not concerned about money buy bigger device with unified memory (Mac Studio) so you will be able to run large set of models on any framework
• Or if you really have to much money just buy four server grade Nvidia cards and burn through electricity and your wallet running giant models really fast
• Or… forget about running it on your own and just buy some subscription or rent a server! This is pretty cost effective since it is not you will be burning through your credits for tokens adding groceries to your TODO list

Thinking about that I realized that last thing would be most reasonable thing to do. But this is not about that. I like my privacy. That is why I have my own e-mail server. That is why I have my own cloud solution. That is why I have de googled my phones. That is why I do not have Windows. I do not plan to sell my data just to have some bot send me summarization of my own calendar that I have self hosted too. This is why I did next not-so-bad thing and decided to buy Strix Halo machine, PC based on AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395. With Linux installed, unified memory configured mostly for GPU that is a bit slow but should still give me decent interference speed.

Prices of those machines are not great too but at least they should be power effective. I considered:

• GMKTEC EVO-X2 which is a bit pricey being around 15kPLN (~4kUSD) and people were complaining about some problems with it
• There is also Framework Desktop that is priced a bit better and Framework seems like a bit more trusting brand. And this unit looks pretty slick. Too bad it also have only lousy 2,5GB/s network
• There is Beelink GTR9 Pro which looks really nice with 10GB/s and USB4… But it can be only pre-ordered and you have to wait for 35 days
• And there is Minisforum MS-S1 MAX which looks like the best option there with better price and double 10GB/s NIC and USB-4. And price is 135000PLN (~3672USD)

Minisforum seemed like a best option really. I would have to wait few days though for it. Desktop from the Framework was available right away and… I could buy only the motherboard. Design is nice but they ask you to buy pieces of plastic for few dollars each.

I could print them myself though. Or not buy them. I decided on the latter and just bought the motherboard.

With the predicted delivery in 3 working days and total price of 8,804.06 (~2400USD) it looked fairly sensible solution.

I ordered one and it will arrive on Wednesday! Can’t wait!